rolanni: (Sleepy)
rolanni ([personal profile] rolanni) wrote2009-04-10 01:33 pm
Entry tags:

What goes around poll

There's been a sort of movable discussion wandering through a couple writer communities I'm part of, brought on in part by writers who are trying to figure out how best to grow their audience, make a living, and maybe even get a bigger piece of the action.

Not surprisingly, many of these conversations come 'round to web serialization for fun and profit, what works, what doesn't. Some folks are of the opinion that giving one's work away "for free" is always a bad deal for the writer, some folks think that giving work away "for free" is the wave of the future, whereupon we're all gonna starve, some folks think that asking readers to kick in a buck for downloading a novel direct from the author is tacky, some think it's OK, but that no one will pay.

In other words, it's a complicated subject and lots of bright people are struggling to make sense of it, and to figure out how to work current realities to their benefit while simultaneously trying to figure out where current realities are going to take us in one, three, six years.

Now, Steve and I did well with our web serializations. I honestly don't know if that's because of a Paradigm Shift, or because we have Incredibly Cool Fans(TM), or because we were writing a Liaden story -- or a combination of all those factors and a bunch that I haven't thought of.

In the spirit of trying to figure some stuff out myself, I offer the following poll, going from the general to the specific.


[Poll #1381306]

[identity profile] wdonohue.livejournal.com 2009-04-10 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
If possible, I'd prefer an ePub formatted work over a PDF. PDF is easier to generate, but ePub can look better on a wider variety of platforms:

Stanza: http://www.lexcycle.com/
Bookworm: http://bookworm.oreilly.com/about/
http://blog.threepress.org/2009/04/06/bookworm-reading-mode/

I'm still working out best workflows for doing this type of conversion, but starting with a clean layout in InDesign is a big step in the right direction.

-- Brian out --

[identity profile] masgramondou.livejournal.com 2009-04-10 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. some other ebook format than PDF is good.

[identity profile] wdonohue.livejournal.com 2009-04-10 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
In reading the comments, the other advantange of ePub comes to mind - the format's underpinnings are XHTML and CSS. This means that ePub files can be modified in-browser for the visually-impaired, or read out by any web-capable screen reader. You can force PDF files to do these things, but it's a lot of post-production work.

-- Brian out --

[identity profile] gingerwood.livejournal.com 2009-04-10 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Ditto. I really want something that I can convert easily into something that my kindle can read. A choice of formats would be ideal
sraun: portrait (Default)

[personal profile] sraun 2009-04-22 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll agree with this - my personal preference is plain HTML or some other unencumbered format.

PDF can be significantly improved by allowing the text to reflow. That's my big objection - most PDFs are generated for either a computer screen or a printed page, and they're impossible to read on a hand-held platform. For e-books, turning on re-flow makes a HUGE difference in the usability.