rolanni: (foxy)
rolanni ([personal profile] rolanni) wrote2009-11-30 05:05 pm

Splat

...also?

Oww.

So! Kirkus Reviews sees Harlequin's vanity publishing plan and realizes, ohmighod, those books will never get reviewed in a traditional venue, like, say Kirkus, and! there's money in them thar hills.

Announcing Kirkus Discoveries, where "independently published authors" can, for a mere $400 purchase a review*.

I think we're moving toward a business model here where only the wealthy can afford to publish. Maybe I'd better start a bookstore for "independently published authors" and sell shelf-space by the per-foot.

going to go bang my head against my desk now

Edited to add: OK; Kirkus was more forward-looking than Harlequin; here's a 2004 opinion piece on the Discoveries program, from the Christian Science Monitor. Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] slrose and [livejournal.com profile] janni for the heads-up.


-----------
*Just in case someone doesn't know -- No, here in Genre Fiction Land we don't pay for reviews, either.

[identity profile] hapaxnym.livejournal.com 2009-12-01 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Oy vey, Kirkus Discoveries, the great embarrassing blot on an otherwise premiere review journal...

FWIW, it's published as a glossy pullout insert, and everyone I knows does just that -- pulls and throws out, unread, like any other ad. (And remember, unlike most review journals, Kirkus doesn't take ads, publisher or otherwise, so they really do have to do *something* to keep the journal running. I wish they had come up with something else, though.)

Also, I know a fair number of Kirkus reviewers, and not one would write for Discoveries -- not one would be anything but insulted to be ASKED to write for discoveries -- even though the pay is significantly better than for regular reviews.

Not that it makes it any less disgusting.