Regarding the myth that readers determine what gets published
OK, so I just read this article in PW about new trends in YA, or What's Hot and What's Not.
And the Nice Agent People are all allowing as how they participated in the flooding of the market with Urban Fantasy and Dystopian novels, until nobody wants UF or Dystopian novels any more, and now they're looking for the Coming Thing, which they believe will be "Contemporary Fiction." Which they will proceed to flood the market with until nobody wants it anymore, and then they'll be looking for the Coming Thing.
And my question is...why the hell can't we learn that flooding the market with anything serves no one? That a balanced approach means that every reader can find something that they like to read, all the time? I've stopped reading Science Fiction a couple of times in my life because I happened to hate the Hot Thing, and there! was! nothing else! but! the Hot Thing on offer. The years when all the SF had to be Hard, and Space Opera was dead, were especially trying.
Also, I'm kind of tired of proclamations like, "Second World Fantasy is dead." Because? Those sorts of proclamations, made by people who, actually don't know if Second World Fantasy is really dead, or just taking a breather -- mean that no one is going to be able to sell a Second World Fantasy to any of the established houses, the editors of which know that SWF is dead. . .which is why writers (1) Drink and (2) Self Publish.
And the trilogy thing? For years authors who had written a good, tight standalone novel were told that they "had" to write a trilogy. Which meant that the author sometimes "stretched" the ideas that had made a enthralling standalone until they broke, the trilogy tanked and readers got mad -- at them, not at the folks who "knew" that standalones were dead.
*deep breath*
So, it's a good thing that we're sitting over here in our corner, writing Space Opera set in a universe of our own devising, which we've been doing for a while now, and not starting-out writers starving for publication, and studying the Hot Trends in the hope that their book will be bought during the flood's high water mark.
*looks at button*
*pushes it off*
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm not sure why people believe the book industry is so narrow. Especially now, with self-pub and independent publishers busily growing the range of offerings.
Balance. What a radical concept! Makes sense, too.
Incidentally, given the time to write, peddle, and eventually publish something, does it make sense to try to hit today's hot stuff, or even next year's hot stuff? More like several years out, isn't it?
(no subject)
no subject
Fortunately, as I get older, I appreciate re-reading old friends more and more. It gets me through the droughts. And when one of my favourite authors produces a new book with a familiar universe/setting/character, it's a lovely excuse to take a trip with the earlier ones in that "series".
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It's enough to make one enter a nunnery. A *cloistered* nunnery ....
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Oz
Just ignore that.
Please keep writing your own stuff.
By the way, is there any chance you eventually write a sequel for "The Tomorrow Log"? I know that this project was declared abandoned, but one can still hope.
Re: Just ignore that.
Re: Just ignore that.
no subject
Even more of a disappointment is getting a glut of well-written books in a particular sub-genre only to find that new titles are no longer being offered. Much like searching the grocery shelves for "Ceasar Parmasan" salad dressing. Oh yea, good marketing... get the consumer to develop a taste for something and then take it away. (I actually miss hard Science Fiction.)
(no subject)
no subject