Thoughts before Errands
Friday, April 15th, 2005 09:43 amEDITED TO ADD: This is what I get for posting a "news" story before I do my back-checks, which you'd think I'd know better than.
The story now behind the cut-line below is, as mentioned by Alert Readers, a hoax. The only back-trails are to the original article in the alternative newspaper Pointblank, and about a zillion blog entries expressing horror. The lesson -- beside the obvious reminder to yr hmbl correspondent to check her facts -- appears to be that the current political climate makes such a story seem probable to a good number of intelligent people.
I give you the case of Sgt. Emiliano Santiago, who served out his contracted 8 years, only to find that the goverment has set back his termination date until December 24, 2031.
From the Seattle Times:
Since members of the Army National Guard have been serving on active duty since October 2001, Byron said the law allowed military planners to involuntarily extend the duty of Santiago and any other Guardsmen.
Santiago's attorney, Steven Goldberg, argued the judges should read Santiago's contract carefully and come down on the side of a teenaged recruit who did not read all the pertinent federal codes relating to military service.
Goldberg also noted that involuntarily extending terms of duty would have a chilling effect on recruitment.
"If you accept what the government is saying, what young man or woman would be willing to sign up?" he asked.
...Look carefully at Mr. Goldberg's question: Who under these circumstances is going to be willing to sign up. Now we have the answer, with thanks to
matociquala for pointing this out:
( hoax story behind the cut )
The story now behind the cut-line below is, as mentioned by Alert Readers, a hoax. The only back-trails are to the original article in the alternative newspaper Pointblank, and about a zillion blog entries expressing horror. The lesson -- beside the obvious reminder to yr hmbl correspondent to check her facts -- appears to be that the current political climate makes such a story seem probable to a good number of intelligent people.
I give you the case of Sgt. Emiliano Santiago, who served out his contracted 8 years, only to find that the goverment has set back his termination date until December 24, 2031.
From the Seattle Times:
Since members of the Army National Guard have been serving on active duty since October 2001, Byron said the law allowed military planners to involuntarily extend the duty of Santiago and any other Guardsmen.
Santiago's attorney, Steven Goldberg, argued the judges should read Santiago's contract carefully and come down on the side of a teenaged recruit who did not read all the pertinent federal codes relating to military service.
Goldberg also noted that involuntarily extending terms of duty would have a chilling effect on recruitment.
"If you accept what the government is saying, what young man or woman would be willing to sign up?" he asked.
...Look carefully at Mr. Goldberg's question: Who under these circumstances is going to be willing to sign up. Now we have the answer, with thanks to
( hoax story behind the cut )