Just wondering...
...how is Mississippi going to afford to enforce this amendment? I mean, Topeka, Kansas just voted to stop prosecuting domestic violence cases 'cause there isn't enough money in the budget and something had to get cut. Last I looked, Kansas was right there at 28 or 29 in state wealth and Mississippi? Was dead last.
They obviously have enough money for this crap
She was suicidal, and lost her baby during the suicide attempt. Only to survive and she ius being prosecuted for murder.
The people in power don't give a damn about the carnage and damage they cause, they just care about promoting their evil causes and enriching their wealthy masters.
no subject
no subject
Have fun.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nope, just a depraved effort to enslave women completely
They're all heartless bastards.
no subject
/end of bitter sarcasm
no subject
This is the sort of attack on women's basic human rights - these people want a *zygote* to have more rights than a woman!? - that really gets my blood boiling... I've gone to the Jackson Women's Health Organization webpage, signed their petition, and left a donation. Tomorrow, I call the offices of Senators Carper and Coons, and Representative Carney, to ask them why they are not discussing this on the floor of Congress.
no subject
These men need to learn some biology first. oops, second -- they need to have a brain *first*.
Any man who thinks that charging ....
(Anonymous) 2011-10-13 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)... I will grant you that the primary victims will be women ... but it affects us all ...
elgordo303.livejournal.com
(stupid work won't let me sign in!! )
Re: Any man who thinks that charging ....
no subject
As I understand it the Topeka thing is a city budget fight. It isn't legal in the state to assault your domestic partner, but the city is trying to foist the costs for prosecuting the cases onto the state level rather than the city. I don't fully understand that but it is a poor thing to use for budget negotiations.
no subject
no subject
Oh, that's simple. They'll just cut expenditures on something unimportant, like health care for the indigent, or affordable housing. After all, it's well-known that poor people are only poor because they are lazy, no?
Well, exept for those unfortunates who are unemployed because some evil Latino came across the border illegally and stole his job.
But either way, coddling people of that sort by providing them with benefits only encourages them to remain poor and unemployed.
/irony