Fan Fiction: Against
Thursday, June 23rd, 2005 09:04 pmRobin Hobb has posted a cogent rant here. Link from
pegkerr
I know that some folks on my friends list write fan fic, and may thus not agree with Robin's points. If you feel compelled to disagree with them here, please be polite and rational. Posts deemed impolite, irrational, or both, by Eagles Over the Kennebec Management will be deleted.
In the service of Full Disclosure and Fair Warning, I do agree with Robin's points. Scott Lynch (link also from
pegkerr) does not.
I know that some folks on my friends list write fan fic, and may thus not agree with Robin's points. If you feel compelled to disagree with them here, please be polite and rational. Posts deemed impolite, irrational, or both, by Eagles Over the Kennebec Management will be deleted.
In the service of Full Disclosure and Fair Warning, I do agree with Robin's points. Scott Lynch (link also from
no subject
Date: 2005-06-23 07:58 pm (UTC)Fan fiction, using someone else's characters and world, which was published wholesale in violation of the original creator's wishes? You've added "in violation of the original creator's wishes" to the definition. I don't know if Bujold ever circulated her fanfic; Caine did and does. Bujold has described her early work as Star-Trek-based, as did Caine; Gene Roddenberry was fic-friendly.
But the statement was that it's impossible for a published writer to begin writing with fanfic, and that's demonstrably false.
When you say "fan fiction", unmodified, you cover both media-based and print-based fiction. Before Harry Potter, most fanfiction was media-based; I don't know what the distribution looks like now.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 06:08 am (UTC)Fair enough. I happen to remember when Robin came across a cache of unauthorized fan fic based on her work, and the difficulty of communicating to the writer why she (Robing) found this objectionable.
To clarify: The fan fic I object to is that which is written and published in violation of the original creator's wishes, without asking (and honoring) the permission of the original creator.
I realize that some writers do give permission -- I can't fathom it, myself (obviously), but there you are.
Personally, were I a beginning writer (as I once was), and if I am wishing to be a careful craftsperson (as most beginning writers very much wish to be), I'd much rather build my own world and play there (which is, by the way, exactly what I did -- some of which became the Liaden Universe(R)), than have the added burden of making certain that I'm not violating the rules of a borrowed universe/relationship structure/&c.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 10:04 pm (UTC)I'm not trying to be difficult. I merely seem to have missed a step in your argument.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-25 05:35 am (UTC)And now I'm confused. I'm reading the above to imply that Low Port (edited by Sharon Lee and Steve Miller, Meisha Merlin, 2003), is a work of fanfic. If you read and enjoyed the book, (rather than simply enjoying ownership of it) then you know that Low Port was a collection of original short stories written to a theme, that theme being: Tell a story in which the hero/es is/are someone who lives on the wrong side of the spaceport's (or castle's) tracks. There were no Liaden stories included (not even mine); we said specifically in our guidelines (and in our foreword) that Low Port was not a Liaden Universe(R) shared-world antho. If that's the step you're missing, I'm very sorry, but I don't know how a careful reader could have missed this, or formed the opinion that the stories included had anything to do with the Liaden Universe(R).
To answer your other question -- at least, I think it was a question... Low Port was an open anthology (that means we accepted submissions from anyone who read the guidelines and sent us a story -- and a number of people who apparently hadn't read the guidelines, but sent us a story anyway). We did buy stories from a few "young" writers (meaning that, at the time we bought the stories, those authors hadn't yet seen much published), but I don't think we bought anyone's first pro sale. Of course folks like Lee Modesitt, Ru Emerson, eluki bes shahar, Jody Lynn Nye, Mark Tiedemann -- to name a few -- are well-seasoned authors. While Lee, eluki, and Mark specifically wrote stories set in their own on-going universes, every story appearing in Low Port is, to the best of my knowledge, an original work.
Low Port and Anthologies
Date: 2005-06-25 07:21 am (UTC)Since I brought up the topic, may I inquire about what you think of shared-world anthologies which are based on the universe of a single writer? I've always been curious as to why pro writers do or don't get involved with such projects.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 06:39 am (UTC)I think it is vandalism, and it's often willful, gleeful, rather than simply ignorant vandalism. In one case (involving one of my stories) someone took a carefully built, multifacted empath and turned him into a bullying, power-mad rapist. For fun.
That's vandalism, that's abuse, that's copyright infringement -- and if ever there'd been a chance I'd go for more or less open attitude toward Liaden fanfic it was shot down right there.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 10:20 am (UTC)This depends on whether one is using "most" in its narrow sense of "a plurality", or the broad colloquial sense of "the preponderance".
There was a significant strata of print-driven fanfic prior to the Harry Potter phenomenon, and it was notable for being strongly associated with what have sometimes been called "mimetic" fandoms, wherein readers of a particular series expend considerable time and effort in reproducing elements of the fictional setting in real life -- producing craftwork and costumes, forming organized fan clubs, putting on exhibitions or convention parties, establishing organizations that mirror those found in the source novels. And for a good while, authors whose works spawned mimetic fandoms actively encouraged (and supervised, to varying degrees) the writing of fanfic based in those settings.
Specific examples: MZB's Darkover, McCaffrey's Pern, Lackey's Valdemar, Katherine Kurtz's "Deryni" series. There are likely others, but these were dominant. Mercedes Lackey no longer sanctions fanfic (though I believe that some of the stories in the first Valdemar shared-world anthology from DAW originated via fanfic channels); I believe Kurtz still does (and persuaded one of her publishers to issue a book consisting in part of some of that "authorized" fanfic), and I'm not sure about McCaffrey.
The mimetic fandoms seem, for the most part, to have sharply diminished with the advent of the Internet, though greater concern with legal liability issues is also clearly a factor; the reasons for that are probably worth discussing, but not necessarily in this thread.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-24 03:22 pm (UTC)There was for a time a (moderated) section for Pern fanfic on Anne's official website. She has also in the past vigorously acted to protect the Dragonriders of Pern trademark and her copyright. My sense was that the fanfic section was something on the order of a controlled experiment.