Fan Fiction: Against

[rolanni]

Robin Hobb has posted a cogent rant here. Link from pegkerr

I know that some folks on my friends list write fan fic, and may thus not agree with Robin's points. If you feel compelled to disagree with them here, please be polite and rational. Posts deemed impolite, irrational, or both, by Eagles Over the Kennebec Management will be deleted.

In the service of Full Disclosure and Fair Warning, I do agree with Robin's points. Scott Lynch (link also from pegkerr) does not.

Comments

Re: *Why* would you do it?

[rolanni.livejournal.com]

It's the sweeping generalizations that bring me out to argue.

Me, too.

Who is being harmed when you work in a universe whose creator consents?

When creator consent is present, then there's no problem for him/her/it, their universe, or the fans who chose to write in that universe.

The problem comes when people begin to think that any work of fiction is fair game for their re-interpretation and publication, and that by the act of publishing, the original creator has relinquished all control over his/her/its work.

(Note: No one here has argued this; I have seen this argument made elsewhere by fanfic writers, and I can't begin, holding to my own rules of polite and rational discourse, to describe how offensive that viewpoint is.)

To be clear: The difficulty on both sides of the question arises in part from inconsistency: It's OK to fanfic Gaiman; it's not OK to fanfic Lee & Miller -- add a unsophisticated (or entitled) fan writer and you have a problem. Lee & Miller have to get ugly; the fan's bewildered; people get mad and little the landscape with sweeping generalizations.

It might -- perhaps -- help matters if people who wrote and published approved fanfic included a disclaimer. Something on the lines of: Neil Gaiman has given his permission for fan writers to write in the X universe he created; here's the link to the permission, check it out. This would, IMHO, be much more honest -- and useful -- than the mistaken, but oft-repeated, "Because we make no money from the publication of this unauthorized story, the author's copyright has not been placed in jeopardy."

This may solve nothing; or it may alert would-be fanfic writers that there's a level of potential unpleasantness present in the use of another person's intellectual property, and that it's best to check before writing.

Re: *Why* would you do it?

[rolanni.livejournal.com]

little the landscape

That would of course be "litter the landscape."

Gah.

Re: *Why* would you do it?

[jonquil.livejournal.com]

The utter ineditability of LJ comments drives me bonkers. I know why it's there socially, to keep people from changing what they claim to have said, but argh.

Re: *Why* would you do it?

[jonquil.livejournal.com]

For instance, in my posting above, "that fanfic can be" should be "that fanfic CANNOT be". Sigh.