Most Popular Tags
- alliance of equals - 67 uses
- books read in 2014 - 49 uses
- books read in 2015 - 46 uses
- books read in 2016 - 72 uses
- books read in 2017 - 63 uses
- books read in 2018 - 55 uses
- books read in 2019 - 56 uses
- books read in 2020 - 84 uses
- books read in 2021 - 74 uses
- books read in 2022 - 69 uses
- books read in 2023 - 64 uses
- books read in 2024 - 51 uses
- books read in 2025 - 50 uses
- carousel seas - 53 uses
- carousel tides - 49 uses
- chop wood carry water - 132 uses
- coon cat logic - 595 uses
- day-job - 144 uses
- dragon in exile - 45 uses
- duainfey - 60 uses
- electrik books - 59 uses
- everybody talks about the weather - 433 uses
- five minutes of fame - 218 uses
- fledgling - 61 uses
- ghost ship - 93 uses
- health stuff - 245 uses
- infodump - 106 uses
- inquiring minds - 55 uses
- it's all about the clothes - 53 uses
- liaden universe world tour - 69 uses
- life after the apocalypse - 624 uses
- longeye - 51 uses
- mouse and dragon - 109 uses
- psa - 65 uses
- publishing - 67 uses
- reading - 65 uses
- reading matters - 50 uses
- saltation - 48 uses
- shameless self-promotion - 264 uses
- splinter universe - 53 uses
- technology threat or menace? - 61 uses
- the book presently known as george - 43 uses
- the glamor! - 202 uses
- the glamour! - 63 uses
- the writer at work - 305 uses
- the writer goofing off - 261 uses
- the writing life - 479 uses
- to-do - 47 uses
- writing - 307 uses
- writing life - 56 uses
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
culture
Date: 2004-11-23 03:26 pm (UTC)Joythree
no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 03:33 pm (UTC)Culture endures from generation to generation.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 04:29 pm (UTC)Popular Culture is studied in the Folklore Department, or the Anthropology and Sociology Departments, or the [Insert Name of Country or Ethnic Group Here] Studies Department, or even in the Popular Culture Department, and if you're producing it you're generally SOL for grant support. Popular culture gets no respect at all; the wealth and fame are supposed to be enough, even if you as an individual producer of it don't have all that much of either.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 07:10 pm (UTC)I'm trying to figure out how popular culture became divorced from the people who use it/live in it/partake of it/do something with it. It didn't develop in a vacuum, and it wouldn't have developed as it has unless someone somewhere was making money from it, which in turn wouldn't happen unless a number of people were participating in it.
A TV pundit responding to a similar concern said, blame the marketplace. Sex sells.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-23 08:25 pm (UTC)One meaning, used by anthropologists (in my reading, at least), is anything that humans create, teach one another, and pass down to later generations: techniques, rituals, beliefs. Pretty broad definition. I don't believe this definition can be opposed to "popular culture."
The more specific definition that could be opposed to "popular" would be, could be, further identified as "high" culture. Here I feel much less sure of myself, but I'll gp out on a limb and say it's the sum of the arts that are created to please an educated audience. The audience would ideally be educated in the history and techniques of the various arts: literature, painting, music etc.
"Popular" would then be intended to please an uneducated audience: simpler designs, more immediately accessible.
Educated audiences will often enjoy the popular arts, but they will approach it with irony or condescension. (They'll call genre fiction or comics "paraliterature," for instance.)Uneducated audiences will simply find high culture boring or puzzling, or they will enjoy the simplest, most obvious parts of the music, art. literature.
I'm not even going to try to define "folk culture."
So I've taken a whack at it. Does that jibe with your understanding?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-24 03:44 pm (UTC)The best example would be an advertisement.