Why writers drink, Part Whoknows

[rolanni]

An alert reader sends me this link to an article at Techdirt, in which the author of the article is lambasting The Authors Guild (the mandate of which is to protect the rights of its author-members; a mandate that it tries to fulfill, with mixed results)of being anti-education and anti-learning because it’s Being Mean to some university libraries who “got tired” of waiting for Congress to figure out copyright (yet again) and decided to take matters into their own hands.

These libraries decided that if a work was, in their sole judgement (using what methodology is unclear), “orphaned” then it belonged to no one, was thus free, and the library could therefore scan it and make it available.

Mind you, I’m a fan of libraries. I have some real issues with the rhetoric of certain professors, who, snug in their well-paying day-jobs like to talk about the Evils of Copyright! and Mean Intellectual Property Holders Keeping Information Hostage! and How an Author Never Made Money from Their Copyrights! …and a whole lot of other arrant nonsense that just makes me want to go lie down in a darkened room with a cool towel on my forehead.

There are a couple of issues regarding this article, and the comments to the article.

One: The whole Orphan Works Issue that we all hear so much about and which is the total justification put forth by universities and Google and proselytizing professors? Is a red herring. There are NOT millions or even hundreds of thousands of Brilliant! Works! Still! In! Copyright! just lying around the place whose authors-or-rights-holders have fallen off the face of the earth and cannot be found, that in-force copyright therefore Robbing! The! Ages! of those gems.

One-Ay: If a work appears to be “orphaned,” i.e. the author is dead, the last publisher of record knows nothing about who might be handling the literary estate? Still doesn’t mean there isn’t a rights-holder, somewhere, who is, either willfully or through ignorance, withholding the use of the work, and the universities, and Google and the proselytizing profs are still stealing from those rights-holders by taking matters into their own hands. “We don’t wanna look for them,” and “it’s too hard!” isn’t the same as “can’t be found.”

One-Bee: Just publishing everything you (see universities, Google and PP, above) can get your hands on and saying that, if a right-holder happens to notice that they’re being stolen from, they can file a DMCA notice is…oh, breathtakingly arrogant. For starters.

Two: Big Biz Education, Google, and Proselytizing Profs really need to get out into the real world, and talk to real writers — not! academic writers; real writers, by whom I mean exactly those Evil! Copyright! Holders! who, um, do and are making money, and sometimes their sole living from those copyrights; from the mouths of whom the universities, Google and the well-paid Proselytizing Professors are taking Actual Food.

Edited to add: Link to the Authors Guild side of the story

Edited again: Link to NYTimes story regarding Judge Chin’s rejection of Google’s Grand Plan to Digitize the Known Galaxy.

And!Judge Chin’s breakout quote, which I couldn’t find yesterday: “A copyright owner’s right to exclude others from using his property is fundamental and beyond dispute.” – Judge Chin, 2011

Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.

Comments

[hapaxnym.livejournal.com]

Be it stated that
a) I completely agree with the main thrust of this post; and
b) as a librarian, I consider copyright protection among my core responsibilities;

nonetheless, I would enter a plea that the author re-consider her repeated jabs at "well-paid professors."

Because I am married to a professor and most of my friends are professors. I assure you, the vast majority of them are extremely poorly paid -- worse than the local high school teachers, in fact -- and without the pension, health care, and other benefits public school teachers and I receive as union members.

I don't want to pit teachers against professors against authors as "You have it worse than I." But even if you have the pay stub of the particular professor who has torqued you off, you may wish to consider that zie may well be the equivalent of Nora Roberts as a representative of the income from zir profession.

[rolanni.livejournal.com]

Sigh.

There is, as I know, a Great Disparity in what Professors are Paid. The Traveling Scholars, in particular, have my sincere pity, as an overworked and cruelly underpaid class. Certainly, lots of professors are paid much less than the professors at my place of late employment.

That Said.

The particular professors in question, above, are highly-paid Star Professors (Lawrence Lessig, I'm looking at you, sir). You know, the ones who can actually afford to proselytize because they have grad students to teach their classes and mark their papers. And those folks, who make a game out of playing with my ability to make a living -- those folks have every single bit of my scorn.

I hope that clears up any misunderstanding.

[hapaxnym.livejournal.com]

Thank you for the clarification. I assumed that you had particular "professors" in mind, but I couldn't suss out whom from the original post.