A colleague sends me the following link to the Copyright Alliance Blog, which argues that SOPA is good for copyright holders and those opposing are distorting the facts.
You are grievously misunderstanding the bill. It is not censorship to prevent people from breaking the law or inciting others to break the law.
There is no first amendment right to break the laws of the USA.
Copyright infringement is illegal. It is punishable by up to 5 years in prison or a fine of $250,000 per work infringed.
Censorship is when Ron Wyden deletes the comments on his YouTube page that are critical of his reasons for opposing copyright protections for American copyright owners.... and then he claims that he is for an OPEN internet.
I suppose I must be very grievously misunderstanding it indeed. My assumption was that they were doing this by blocking access to sites. Which, by my definition, is censorship. Whether it's moral or not, it's still censorship. Whether it stops illegal actions or not, it's censorship. That's just what it is, because that's what censorship is.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mmmag
Re: SOPA
Date: 2011-12-12 01:52 am (UTC)There is no first amendment right to break the laws of the USA.
Copyright infringement is illegal. It is punishable by up to 5 years in prison or a fine of $250,000 per work infringed.
Censorship is when Ron Wyden deletes the comments on his YouTube page that are critical of his reasons for opposing copyright protections for American copyright owners.... and then he claims that he is for an OPEN internet.
Re: SOPA
Date: 2011-12-14 12:46 am (UTC)