It’s wrong to steal, Part Whatever
Sunday, January 29th, 2012 03:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Very much worth a read: Juliet E. McKenna talks about copyright, piracy, and free speech.
Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.
Very much worth a read: Juliet E. McKenna talks about copyright, piracy, and free speech.
Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-29 10:31 pm (UTC)Copyright law doesn't tell you that you can't lend books you've bought for your Kindle -- AMAZON tells you that. The vendor.
What I -- the copyright holder -- say is, "Buy my book." NOT, "Rip off my book and post it on the web for free because you have politics, or entitlement, or because you can."
Yep, I'm angry, too. And it's not my content, dammit -- it's my work, my stories, my characters, and my livelihood.
I agree that SOPA was...ill-advised, at the least. You may remember the very many posts I made about it in these pages. And I agree that there's too much greed on the sides of publishers and vendors.
On the other hand? Stealing remains wrong.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-29 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-29 11:39 pm (UTC)re: content -- i didn't realize that such a neutral word as "content" would be taken as insulting. i meant it as a collective noun, not as a belittling descriptive. i apologize for causing offense. :\
no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 01:30 am (UTC)But it's not a neutral word; and (in my experience) it's often used to devalue real and hard work. [fe]Anyone with access to a keyboard can produce "content." It's what the boss wants on the company website -- "An image, to show people Who We Are. . .and a little content, to fill it in."[fe]
A novel isn't "content," in exactly the same way a love letter isn't "content."
i apologize for causing offense. :\
Apology accepted; thank you.