On archiving papers
Friday, July 25th, 2014 10:54 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A couple people in different conversations over the last few days brought up the idea of archiving our papers. There was mention that this course could even produce a "tax deduction." In the interests of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater, I contacted Lynne Thomas, the archivist at Northern Illinois University, who has been actively attending science fiction conventions and pitching the benefits of archiving papers for a few years now. She is also, <fe>in what I imagine is her abundant spare time</fe> helping SFWA gather up its various papers and sort them into a rational archive.
Lynne sent me a bunch of links explaining archives, and why you should, and what you should, as well as a list of libraries with large-ish SF collections. Those links are reproduced below, for those who have an interest.
I want to address this notion of the "tax deduction," since it keeps rearing its hoary head. The US Post Office long ago decreed that authors mailing manuscripts to, say, their publishers, could only insure the package for the cost of the paper. The words, ruled the USPS, were worthless. So, even if your publisher purchased the novel you were now putting in the mail for $20,000 up-front; if the package was lost, you stood to collect the price of a ream of paper, i.e. the "real property."
The IRS, not surprisingly, agrees with its sister government organization, and they have ruled, for the purpose of "tax deductions" that only the cost of the real materials may be deducted. The priceless words are, in a word, exactly priceless. If you donate a published book to the collection, then you may deduct the cover price, because a book is "real property."
Also, most libraries do not have the funds to help authors mail their archival materials. So if you have a dump truck load of, say, typescripts, you're going to have to bear the expense of getting them to the archive of your choice. The postage is probably tax deductible, as a business expense -- PLEASE NOTE that this is me, talking through my hat. Check with your accountant. Always check with your accountant about stuff like this.
All that being said, I've talked the situation over with Steve and we are throwing this mountain of typescripts away.
Here are those links I promised:
Information on the SFWA Collection at NIU
no subject
Date: 2014-07-25 07:59 pm (UTC)Never have had the ego to think anyone would be interested in my archives.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-25 08:08 pm (UTC)I have from the first hung onto the final printout, because Something Might Happen. And also because I'm a child of the Paper Age.
I go back and forth on the archiving thing. I do have some correspondence that might possibly be of interest to those who are interested in such things, and some notes that may ditto.
On the other hand, the University of Maryland's collection became unfunded, they fired the curator and now I believe it's only open by appointment; no one is actually taking care of what's there; there's no catalog, so any researcher will need to know that Paper X exists and is in the collection through independent means.