Collaboration 101: How We Do It, Last Riff
Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 05:36 pmI'd meant to finish this set earlier. Unfortunately, book deliveries and more angst than usual at the day-job kind of distracted me.
Now, one of the things that people ask Steve and me about collaborating is how we resolve artistic differences; there are, after all, two of us and we must sometimes disagree. It is true that we do sometimes have different ideas about a story's direction or various technical details. Usually, these differences can be resolved by sitting down and talking, sometimes role-playing, until we're both on the same page again. Often, that page is not exactly what Steve had envisioned and not exactly what I had envisioned, but a blending of the two notions, all working (so we devoutly hope and believe) to strengthen the story.
And this is meet and just.
Sometimes, though, there arises. . .something that cannot be talked, role-played, or compromised away. Something that one of us feels So Very Strongly About that there is no compromise.
This is why each book has a traffic cop.
I suppose it must be the case with most long-time collaborators that some books are more the child of one partner's heart and intellect. Certainly, it's the case with Steve and me, and the traffic cop thus is the person who brought the idea for the story to the partnership. The traffic cop holds the third vote in any disagreement regarding that project; it is a tie-breaker vote, in case we cannot find agreement, and it is binding.
You may say that this is a broad and awesome power -- and you would be right.
That agreed, Steve has used his awesome tie-breaker powers exactly once, in a total of seventeen collaborative novels. I have also used my vote, enforcing my will and my vision on the story -- once.
The details of each case may be of interest, but as they contain spoilers, I'll continue ( behind the cut )
Now, one of the things that people ask Steve and me about collaborating is how we resolve artistic differences; there are, after all, two of us and we must sometimes disagree. It is true that we do sometimes have different ideas about a story's direction or various technical details. Usually, these differences can be resolved by sitting down and talking, sometimes role-playing, until we're both on the same page again. Often, that page is not exactly what Steve had envisioned and not exactly what I had envisioned, but a blending of the two notions, all working (so we devoutly hope and believe) to strengthen the story.
And this is meet and just.
Sometimes, though, there arises. . .something that cannot be talked, role-played, or compromised away. Something that one of us feels So Very Strongly About that there is no compromise.
This is why each book has a traffic cop.
I suppose it must be the case with most long-time collaborators that some books are more the child of one partner's heart and intellect. Certainly, it's the case with Steve and me, and the traffic cop thus is the person who brought the idea for the story to the partnership. The traffic cop holds the third vote in any disagreement regarding that project; it is a tie-breaker vote, in case we cannot find agreement, and it is binding.
You may say that this is a broad and awesome power -- and you would be right.
That agreed, Steve has used his awesome tie-breaker powers exactly once, in a total of seventeen collaborative novels. I have also used my vote, enforcing my will and my vision on the story -- once.
The details of each case may be of interest, but as they contain spoilers, I'll continue ( behind the cut )