Hey, there's going to be a(nother) remake of The Three Musketeers. With a sword-fighting Queen leaping from the balcony of Versailles in court dress in order to take part in a melee. Oh! And an airship. Um, what?

All in Glorious Three-Dee so you're right there in the middle, though without a sword, because, presumably, the audience of this film will have no honor to defend.

Does that seem mean-spirited? Here, judge for yourself

This will make the fourth remake of The Three Musketeers since I started paying attention to them. For me, the definitive version is of course the York-Reed-Finley-Chamberlain 1973 extravaganza. Yeah, I know. What can I say? I was 21 and in love.

Then we had the Truly Awful 1993 edition with all the Hot Young Studs of The Moment -- Kiefer Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, &c, which not only Made No Sense, completely subverted the text when it did, and also had lousy swordfights.

Then in 2001 there was The Musketeer, which made the 1993 edition look like a work of art.

You'd think they'd stop trying, since the editions keep getting worse, but I guess the lure of a free! story! from a dead author is too great to resist.

This is going to be another "The Adventures of Baron von Munchausen," isn't it? Beautiful and infuriating.

...Arthur and the Invisibles


Still feeling a little ragged today, but able to work on revisions. My hope is to get the point where the new ending hooks in today, then finish up tomorrow.

For which virtuous industry my reward shall be (drumroll, please): Writing a synopsis.

Ahem.

In other news, as reported in jhetley's blog, it rained and blew, starting late last night and continuing into the late morning, with occasional bitchy little bursts of moisture off and on during the day. We, at least, have not lost power, as have many folks in Fairfield and Skowhegan.

And so back to work...