rolanni: (Default)
[personal profile] rolanni
Today's question for the group mind: How much editing is Enough; how much is Too Much; and d'ye ever crave more?

[livejournal.com profile] kinzel and I are ...fortunate, I suppose the word is... in generally being edited lightly. This comes with its own set of terrors, of course, and it's not at all unknown for us to impose upon friends to beta-read our latest novel and ask them to Do Their Worst.

However, out there in ListWorld, I've been reading tales from writers -- many of them multi-published authors who clearly know what they're doing -- whose editors edit their proposals, to the extent of not letting them continue on what I consider to be the Real Work -- that would be, writing the book -- until the proposal is up to the editor's standard. This seems beyond foolish to me, but what do I know? My feelings about proposals are ambiguous at best.

Date: 2005-08-16 06:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rolanni.livejournal.com
Editing the proposal would be a little uncomfortable for my own work, though I have done it for work for hire

We have also had extensive editorial input into the front-end of work done for hire. This strikes me as only fair, since the editor is in that case paying us to write their vision, and we want to be sure to have it nailed down at all the corners before we start, in order to avoid Unpleasant Surprises(tm).

Especially if the edits make the story stronger.

No question that, as a friend says, a good editor is worth six months.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags