Eyes Needed
Tuesday, November 14th, 2006 05:08 pmHaving wasted spent odd bits 'n bobs of the last couple days working on a new!improved!grown-up! website, I've now gotten to the point where I'm cross-eyed, and it's on line.
If someone(s) with a couple minutes on their hands could go check it out, test the links, kick the tires and whatnot, I'd be appreciative.
If someone(s) with a couple minutes on their hands could go check it out, test the links, kick the tires and whatnot, I'd be appreciative.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-14 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 12:31 am (UTC)mutter, mumble, dadrabbitted text editor, grump, grumble, snarl
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-14 10:39 pm (UTC)That's the only obvious snag that I see.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 12:33 am (UTC)OK, that's weird. I'm pretty sure it didn't do that, um, earlier. On other hand, I am a sleep-deprived being at this point, so what do I know? I cut the link.
Thanks!
*poke* *poke* *zot*
Date: 2006-11-14 11:46 pm (UTC)On all but the home and bibliography pages, the border at the bottom left corner is sitting on top of the menu text. A function of the border's expanding to fit the body text but not allowing for the presence of the menu?
I run Mac OS 10.4.8 and Safari 2.0.4 (419.3).
Re: *poke* *poke* *zot*
Date: 2006-11-15 12:35 am (UTC)Yep, it's an expandable border, but it doesn't Do That on either of my browsers, so I'm not sure how to fix it...
no subject
Date: 2006-11-14 11:46 pm (UTC)Other than that, very clean and easy to negotiate on Camino, and a reminder that I need to add a contact info page.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 12:36 am (UTC)And the arwen thing is ...just weird...
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 12:39 am (UTC)Thank you.
what do you use to build and maintain your site?
Well...for this one, I used Kate (which is a Linux text editor)-- because y'know, I Need The Practice -- working off a template from OWD (http://www.oswd.org/designs/browse/sortby/date/page/60/), which is a Very Useful Site, indeed.
Link Back
Date: 2006-11-15 01:09 am (UTC)I'm on MacOS running an old version of Firefox and had no problem with the boarders and stuff, all read just fine. I like your layout too, very clean and reads well.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 04:01 am (UTC)Tricia
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 05:46 am (UTC)Ditto in Firefox. Site is soothing...almost austure.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 05:55 am (UTC)Hmm. I like the background color for being your background, I'm having no trouble on my laptop reading the text against it. The font/fonts are fine, I didn't notice them as in "If I notice the font it's because it's negatively drawing attention to itself for me."
I like that there is a consistent look and feel on the the material listed under "Main Menu:"
It was jarring, though to go to the Liad/Korval/etc. links and then get white background\
Regarding the heavy-lined enclosing whatever-it's-called, on the Main Menu pages, that pulls my eye off the text and onto it as heavy thick graphic. I tend to not like such borders things because my eye gets distracted off the text... computers I'm the only user of I don't use backdrop images, just plain default blue usually... not that much of it usually shows. I had more than 70 windows open on my machine at work on Tuesday before I closed some of them... clutter and such I can deal with when it's my own clutter. The new Tamora Pierce novel's design has me irritated, the pages inside the book have borders around them and the borders pull my eyes and attention off the book onto the border graphic.
The rectangular boxes around the Main Menu and Favorite Line areas are a bit jarring to me because rectangles are aesthetically out of harmony with the overall enclosing graphic--the border had rounded on the corner areas and then concavity and the embossed leaves pointing inside the enclosed area. The rectables are of a different width of line, different color, and those sharp right angle pointed corners--rounded off corners if possible I suspect would look better to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-15 02:05 pm (UTC)Jack
New site
Date: 2006-11-15 06:53 pm (UTC)Jan Burke