rolanni: (Alliance of Equals art by David Mattingl)

So, it says here that Carousel Tides (published November 2010) has earned out and paid its fond author royalties. This is the second period in which this has happened, so, yay! Carousel Tides!

Carousel Sun (published February 2014) only has $520 to earn back until it, too, can begin contributing to the author's income stream. Last period, it had more than $1,800 to earn back, so -- well done, Carousel Sun!

For the completists -- Carousel Seas was only published in February 2015 (2015, The Longest Year Ever), so no royalty report this time. Maybe next time.

Across all the royalty statements, sales of ebooks are slightly ahead of hard copy sales.  In the case of the books we've written under contract with Baen, of which Trade Secret is only the most recent example, esales paid back the advance in the first six month's of the titles lives.  Which is interesting, if these sorts of things happen to interest you.

And, no, no report for Dragon in Exile -- maybe the time after next time.

So, that.

# # #

Tomorrow bids fair to be an Odd Day.  Tai Chi from 9-10 am, then change into my impression of business clothes, and head out to the hospital for the afternoon shift.  No one has told me precisely where to report, or even pointed out the employee's entrance, though I think I know where it is.  Also, there's some snafu with my badge, so I won't have it, going in.  Well, at least I know my boss' name, and the location of her office.  The rest can be figured out.

This evening, having finished the errands, and cleaned All The Things, it's time at last to get to work, though what I really want to do is curl up on the couch under a floofy blanket and take a nap.

Ah, well.

Maine continues to labor under a snow-free forecast for at least the next 10 days.  This is just. . .eerie.  Mind you, I'm not complaining; there's a very significant part of me that is Perfectly Happy Never to Shovel Snow Again, but, still -- this is Maine.

And so to work.

Belle using cat tree Jan 22 2016
rolanni: (Alliance of Equals art by David Mattingl)

The question is:  how much world building do you do before starting a new series or tangent? I'm working on my first novel and keep finding I have to backtrack to explain assumptions.

There are a couple of things going on in this question, so I'll deal with the easiest one first:  It's Perfectly OK to have to go back and fix/add stuff in/to your story.  We all do it.  We all get stuff wrong in the first draft.  That's why most of us (I have had conversations with writers who say they write perfectly and never redraft.  Perhaps they do.) do multiple, or rolling, drafts.

As to how much world building I/we do before starting a new series...my first inclination is to say, "None; the characters tell me what I need to know, when I need to know it."

While that's true, it's probably not true enough.  There are certain basic decisions you need to make before you start writing a story.

You should know what kind of story you're writing:  romance, science fiction, fantasy, mystery, literary, &c, &c.  Knowing your genre will narrow what kind of world you're allowed to play in.  Yes, there are crossovers.  The Liaden stories cross genres six ways from Thursday, but they are rooted in the traditions of science fiction.

Now, this business with the characters telling me/us what we need to know?  That's true.  But the reason it's true is that Steve and I tend to "meet" the characters who will be living in any particular story first. That's How We Do It.  Other writers think about the world/society first, and then they think about what kind of people would live in that world, and what kind of trouble they'd get into, what their assumptions are about their world, and if they're right, wrong, or yes.

One of my favorite stories about world building comes from Janet Kagan.  She'd determined to write Hellspark, a book about language, and how it shapes society, thought, and prejudice; about what sentience looks like.  She worked hard on the kinesics of the various characters and cultures, kinesics being a plot-point, and she worked hard on her main character, Tocohl, who was a master linguist able to get around in multiple cultures because of her mastery of language and body language.  She wanted, particularly, for none of the cultures depicted in Hellspark to be "ours."

And she was just about to hand the book in when she realized something.

In her book about alien kinesics?

The master linguist nodded.

Well, she tore the book apart to find and fix each of those incidences.  As one would, of course.

Now, that's not the story of a failure -- the error was caught in time.

But it is a cautionary tale to all of us, to think about what we're doing in the world and society we're building, and to question the easy answers that come from our assumptions and a lifetime of experience in what we like to call the real world.

Ask yourself:  What would a kid who lives in a closed environment where germs and dirt would cause a lot of problems, cuss by?  Might he use, mud, or dirt?  Supposing this closed environment that must be kept clean -- how is that done?  Who does it?  What's it called, the clean-up run?  It's a basic task, keeping the ship clean, a survival task -- is it therefore high-value?  Is the Garbage Man the ranking crewman, revered for keeping the ship spotless and the crew alive?  Or is Stinks a low-level task relegated to the junior-most?  It could go either way, right?  Just because we don't happen to revere sanitation workers in so-called real life doesn't mean that's Natural Order.

Once you've made your choice -- be consistent.  Pay attention.  Daydream about what your choices mean, down the story-road, what interesting developments might spring from them.

. . .but you can do most of that while you're writing, see?  So long as you remember that going back and "fixing" things is a natural part of the process of storytelling.

. . .hope that helps.

Princess with sunshine and string Jan 8 2016
rolanni: (great horned owl)

A*. As many of you know, Larry Smith, known variously as Larry!; Larry Smith, Bookseller; and "the guy in the corner of the dealers room with allllllll the books" -- Larry Smith was in an auto accident on his way home from DragonCon; the van rolled, and needs Major Repairs, or perhaps a replacement.  Larry, and Joni Dashoff, who was also in the van, were very lucky, due to a combination of seatbelts and canny packing of books and display shelves.  Larry did have to spend some time in the hospital, but he was eventually released, and went home to inventory, and take, stock.

The news now is that, while -- again, due to canny packing -- the loss of stock was minimal, Larry -- is back in the hospital.  Con-going fans are aware that this is Archon weekend, and Sally -- Larry's wife, and businessmate -- was, last heard, seriously wondering if she should even try to get to the con.

So, what we have here is:  A van to repair or replace; unexpected hospital bills; loss of expected income.  Not a good roll, on anybody's dice.

Immediately after the accident, Marcia Kelly Illingsworth set up a GoFundMe page for Larry and Sally and the poor, abused van.  Here's your link.  If you can donate, that's super.  If you can spread the word, that will help immensely.

Thanks for listening.

B.  We are approaching the end of the seventh and last! week of the Do It Like A Delm Challenge.  Entries must be received by midnight, Eastern Daylight Time (aka New York Time), on Saturday (tomorrow!) October 3.  The last winner will be chosen and posted on korval.com Monday morning, October 5.  The winning challenger will also receive a coupon for a free Baen ebook of their choice.  Full rules here.

If you've been thinking about entering your challenge pic, you are right down to the wire.  Summon your inner delm -- or always wonder if you could have.

C. Submissions are now open for The Year’s Best Military and Adventure Science Fiction series from Baen Books.  Full guidelines here.

D. I was going to write something about Writers Fugue, and Process and All.  Maybe later.  Right now, I have to balance the checkbook.

E. Y'all have a nice weekend.  If you're in the storm path, stay safe.  Even if you're not in the storm path, stay safe.

F. Here's a picture of Sprite, resting after her labors**:




Sprite, resting from her latest nap.Sprite, recuperating from her latest nap.


____________

*WordPress has decided to be helpful, and format every numbered list into a squinched-up, impossible to read, "standard" format.  Lists-by-letter don't seem to be on its radar.  And, so. . .

**I often post pictures at the bottom of my blog posts to make the announcement of the post prettier for Facebook, which, left to its own devices, usually posts a GINORMOUS (and ugly) G+ graphic.  For those who dislike, or are tired of, photos of cats, spare a little empathy for the Facebook peeps, and avert your eyes.  Thank you.

rolanni: (Caution: Writing Ahead)

It snowed this morning; now, it's spitting ice pellets.  In view of the weather, I declined to go into town, hoping for better tomorrow.

For fun, I called the oil company to find out why we'd run out of oil.  I also solicited promises that this would never happen again, promises the young lady at the Office adroitly failed to give while being oh-so-helpful.  One result of her helpfulness and my continuing failure to understand how this unhappy circumstance could have come about, is that we will host yet! another! tech! tomorrow.  He will check the lines and the intake, the tank, and the furnace itself, to be sure that we don't have a slow leak somewhere, and to patch it if we do.

So, that.

I again called the Maine State Archivist, who was not in, though this time, I got to leave a message with a live person, rather than voice mail.  I received a promise that the Archivist would return my call this afternoon, but I have Doubts that this will actually happen.  Perhaps he'll prove me wrong.

I also called the guy who gave us a quote on putting a rooflet over the outside front stairs, and then disappeared off the face of the earth, to find out if he actually intended to do the work, and when.  That call went to voice-mail, which I supposed I could've predicted.

In between phone calls, and before we had finished off the coffee in the pot, a UPS truck pulled into the driveway, and the driver gave into Steve's hands two boxes of post cards -- one for Trade Secrets and one for Carousel Seas -- which we will be taking with us to PhilCon.  Many thanks to Laura at Baen, for putting this together for us.

The mail brought the yearly aggravation of Form 8802, wherein we pay the government a fee to certify that  that we are, indeed, US citizens, and therefore do not have to pay taxes on monies we earn overseas.  So, yanno, yay.

I should probably finish off my phone calling extravaganza with a call to the ACA, to see if I can get a supervisor, or somebody who has once in their life at least looked over the edge of the box, but I fear the force is not sufficiently strong in me.

Alliance of Equals stands at just a smidge shy of 31,000 words.  I have about 7,700 words (roughly two chapters) left from the words excised from Dragon in Exile, and I believe they go Right About Here, which will put me, again, roughly, at just about 40,000 words.  Which will be a good place to leave it while we go down-coast to party.  When we come home from PhilCon, I'll read those 40,000-ish words, and then move on with the next 60-90,000-ish all-new words.  This book is due on Madame the Editor's desk in February.  No, I don't know when it will be published, or when the eArc will be available, just to nip those both in the bud.

Several people have wanted to know how come Alliance is moving along "so quickly" while Dragon took so long to write.  There are two answers to that -- three answers, if you count the age-old, and very true, "all books write different" -- a simple answer and a complicated one.

The simple answer is:  Dragon is Exile took so long to write because I was trying writing two books at once.

The complicated answer also addresses the question raised by the simple answer ("But WHY were you trying to write two books at once?" so hang on to that one, 'k?  Thx.)

The reason we were trying to write two books at once is:

1.  We pitched five books, and the first book in the pitch had to do with the Dutiful Passage

2.  One of the other books had to do with Surebleak

3.  The Surebleak book wanted to be written first, but I (mostly, it was I) resisted this, insisting that the first book had to be written first.

(A side issue which still influenced the writing -- I was at the bottom of the Manic/Depressive Wheel.  Between us, I was in a hole under the wheel, which is just generally a very bad place to write from.  It's especially a bad place to start writing from, because the beginning of the book is where you set up all the stuff that's going to, yanno, happen in the story.  And the beginning of a series -- or of a five-book dash -- is where you set up the rest of the series.  That means it's really preferable to have good access to your brain.  And the big thing that depression does, besides making you feel bad, is?  Right.  Depression makes you stupid.  So, that.)

4.  By the time I realized that I had to write the Surebleak book first, or kill both it and the Passage book through Auctorial Stupidity, and untangled the plots from each other, the Surebleak book no longer trusted me.

5.  That meant that I needed to coax it, and sweet-talk it, and Calmly Accept whatever bits and pieces it gave me.  Then, after I had all the bits and pieces I was apparently going to get, I had to figure out the order of the scenes, and write all the connective tissue. And! Since the book no longer trusted me, I had to trust it.  Which among other things meant accepting the existence of a character whose purpose in the story was only Revealed as we were going through the penultimate draft.

5a.  Steve could not take over and Just Write the Book because, (1) I was being an idiot, and (2) the entangled plots were a mess the like of which you rarely see.  I hardly knew how to untangle them, and it was my mess.

5b. Tangential Interesting Factoid:  At one point early in our career, we did manage to write A Whole Wrong Book.  The solution to that was easy -- write the correct book.  In the five weeks, I think it was, to deadline.

6.  The good side of all this is that, when we came to address Book the Second, we had almost a quarter of a book already in the can.  Which is why Alliance seems to be moving along at such a spanking pace.

Today's blog title comes to you, again, courtesy of Steeleye Span:  Lady Isobel and the Elf Knight

* * *

Progress on Alliance of Equals
30,874/100,000 OR 31% Complete

"He's a bit stiff in the honor, the third mate," he murmured.

rolanni: (Calvin & Hobbes happy dance)

Steve has revealed a little more of his clever plan to bring Quicksliver to life.  Go here and read all about it!

Also!  The Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance has released the list of finalists for the 2014 Maine Literary Awards.  Among them?  Necessity's Child by Sharon Lee and Steve Miller.  Here's the whole list and details regarding the May 29 awards ceremony in Portland, Maine.

rolanni: (view from space by rainbow graphics)

So, in the month of August, I wrote two short stories.  Here are the opening lines of each:

The Gift of Music:
The ballroom and the concert halls paid best, but they wanted the Big Bands, and the big acts up from New York and Atlantic City.

The Wolf's Bride:
The dogs of the village knew him; and he passed without challenge from forest edge to market street, walking with a predator's sure, silent tread down the moss-lined way.

#

Yesterday, was an Official Day Off, in respect of my hands, which I had managed to offend.  I read Lord of Light for the first time in many years, and remain constant in my opinion that Creatures of Light and Darkness is, just barely, the superior novel.  Others may, of course, disagree.

Today, there is yoga, and grocery shopping, and various small chores, then the opening of the proposal file and the beginning of staring into the middle distance, contemplating Things Liaden.  I will probably also sign sheets of paper -- but not too many sheets of paper, hands; I promise.

So!  What're you doing today that's fun and interesting?

-------

*Ref here (possibly not safe for work, not for content, but for loudness of laughter)

rolanni: (Calvin & Hobbes happy dance)

So!  Last night I finished "The Wolf's Bride," which, at 10,381 words, is officially  a novelette.  Such a cute word, novelette.  "The Gift of Magic," by contrast, is a shortish short story, weighing in at 4,330 words. This means I wrote a grand total of 14,711 words in August.  Which means I'm a slacker.    It's now September, my obligations to my characters are retired, and that little nip of fall in the air tells me it's time to get to work.

So, in anticipation of getting right to work, we slept in this morning,  had a leisurely breakfast of fresh fruit with other things -- in Steve's case, Cheerios; in mine, yogurt with wheat germ -- and then Did Things.  I have other Things still to Do, notably changing out the  old USB hub for one that (hopefully) works, signing lots and lots of pages, and doing the bookkeeping that sort of accumulated in a paper drift on the corner of my desk while I was playing with Cael.

Some day realsoonnow, I need to get Ox set up properly for the upcoming Road Trip, but I suspect that today is not that day.  However, I did buy him a wireless mouse yesterday, to make up for neglecting him.

I hear via Twitter from the redoubtable Mr. Standlee that Spokane has won the bid to host the 2015 WorldCon.  Here's the link, in case you want to register, or volunteer.

Mr. Standlee also lets the world know that Detroit has won the bid to host the 2014 NASFiC (North American Science Fiction Convention).  Here's that link.

Steve and I intend to be at both DetCon and Sasquan.  Hmmm.  I'm going to have to start seriously saving pennies.

In other, though not lesser, news, today is Scrabble's declared eleventh birthday, the Shelter having supposed her to be one year old when she locked up for being an unsupervised juvenile on the streets.  She celebrated by performing a new dance, which I unfortunately did not photograph.  Let us just say that the choreography was both stunning and unique, which we have, of course, come to expect from an artist of Scrabble's standing.

She has now retired to the hefalumps.  Celebratory ice cream is planned later, for Steve and I, with catnip for the Queen of the Day -- and the silly fluffs, too.

Here, have a birthday picture:




Scrabble, celebrating


Scrabble, celebrating


rolanni: (bleedingheart from furriboots)

Things are still somewhat in disarray here at the Cat Farm.  Scrabble and Mozart are still insisting that The Kid has to be here somewhere, darnit, and they occasionally mount exploratory surveys.

Mozart yesterday went over the entire house, using the MomCat call, but damn -- The Kid still didn't turn up.  He then sought Steve out to Explain This At Length, and (possibly) to Demand Assistance.  Steve was, sadly, not able to bring much to this, except to offer scribbles.

Scrabble, ever methodical, periodically checks Socks' favorite spots, and has three times now put his favorite toys into play, noisily -- but that didn't pull him out of his Silly Fluff sulks, either.  There are also Other Worrisome Developments, such as Socks' bowl going missing.  She has duly noted this on the inventory.

The humans are at loose ends, somewhat, and not so sprightly as they might be.  Work, however, goes on; things arrive in the mail; and laundry must be done.

Things that have arrived in the mail include three! guidebooks for Angkor Wat, which are fascinating.  (No, I'm not going to Angkor Wat or Siem Reap or Cambodia or Viet Nam.  No, I don't know why I had to have these books.  The backbrain at work, I suppose. I try not to question too closely in the belief that, eventually, All Will Become Clear.  It would be nice to occasionally get a memo, though.)  Anyhow -- fascinating, with pictures! and teensytinyitsybitsy little print, and it is to swoon.  So, yanno, at least the backbrain's happy.

Also in the mail -- today, in fact -- was a sympathy card from the vet's office, with personal notes from all the staff, aka Socks' Waterville Fan Club; and  Protector, the next Foreigner novel.

Speaking of guidebooks, I ought to get one for New York, so I can figure out how far things are from other things and how to move around the place.  Hmm.  Steve and I will be at Book Expo America (aka BEA) at the end of May, doing a book signing and some other stuff TBA.  In theory, we will have some unscheduled time to do, um, stuff.  Noting that the Sheer Amount of Stuff  in New York makes thinking about what one would like to do-or-see. . .somewhat overwhelming.

But!  What do I find, via the New Yorker, but that Kinky Boots, the Musical! is/will be at the Al Hirschfeld Theatre (located at 45th Street, between 8th and 9th Avenues, it says, here, helpfully, no doubt). This is very exciting, and visions of theater tickets dance in my brain (to be immediately dashed by my lack of knowing almost everything I need to know in order to figure out if a night at the theater is even possible.  That guidebook is looking like a better and better idea...)

#

Of possible interest to those who follow the ups and downs of the publishing biz, and wonder why writers go crazy, is the whole Night Shade Books Nightmare.  Steve and I are not involved with Night Shade, we have no skin in the game, but a lot of our friends and colleagues are involved in this. . .horrifying situation.

Here's a fairly temperate analysis, with history, written by a well-known SF/F agent.

Here's another summary of the situation, by Tobias Buckell.

Here's Phil Foglio's take (Night Shade publishes the Girl Genius text novels (NOT the graphic novels)

Here's the first i09 article regarding the situation.

And, here's Mr. Lassen of Night Shade, in his own words.

Kameron Hurley, one of Night Shade's authors, rings down the sky, and explains why she's considering the "deal."

Andy Zack, of the Zack Literary Agency, weighs in.

#

Progress on Carousel Seas

24,893/100,000 OR 24.89% Complete

"That's an impressive bit of work the man does," I said, slowly. "I wonder if it does any good, in the long run."

rolanni: (Default)

Off on another part of Teh Intertubes, a colleague is writing the last book of a series, and is experiencing separation grief.

During our interview at ConQuesT, I made the comment in reply to. . .something, that readers and writers have a different relationship with the writer’s characters; with readers experiencing something like a traditional, real-world “friendship” with those characters they’ve come to like.  The relationship between an author and her characters is more nearly collaborative, and while I do love my children, I don’t worry about them to the extent that some readers report.

Back at. . . Duckon, I think it was, a few years ago, I happened to overhear a young lady in the hallway between panels who was being congratulated by her colleagues for having made an author on a previous panel (on what I suppose was fan fic) break down and cry.  “She had to be made to understand,” the young lady was saying, very sternly, “that she doesn’t own those characters just because she made them up.  They belong to us, because we give them life!”  (Yes, I did check.  No, I didn’t start in with the young lady then and there.  This is entirely due to the fact that Steve grabbed my arm and pulled me down the hall to our next event.)

All of these things, though, speak to the “reality” of fictional characters, and the hold they have over the minds and hearts of readers (and writers, too, if we do only make them up).  My colleague who is wrapping up the series wonders what will happen to their beloved characters in the minds of readers, once their story is told; and if readers will also experience grief, knowing that this is the last book.

I have my own opinions on this (quelle surprise!), but I’d like to hear yours:  How do you handle the ending of a series?  What’s your relationship with — and your responsibilities toward — people who live in books?




Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.
rolanni: (Ghost Ship)
WARNING: There may be spoilers for Ghost Ship in comments. This is a Warning, this is your only Warning. Proceed at your own risk.

Edited to Add: 
Reminder to Anonymous Posters:  1. Please sign your post(s);  2. Anonymous posts don't appear until I manually OK them.  That means that sometimes -- like today, for instance -- there will be a period of hours before you will be able to see your post.  This is how the system is supposed to work, and you don't need to resubmit.

To everyone:  Good discussion; keep it coming.

So! There's an expressed view that Ghost Ship ends on a cliffhanger, in the form of The Epilogue. We frequently get rapped for "cliffhangers," a charge I happen to think is (1) unfortunate and (2) inaccurate, but that's a rant for another day. What's interesting about the Ghost Ship "cliffhanger" is that the presence of the epilogue creates the "cliffhanger."

My question to you, then, is --

Would Ghost Ship have been a fuller and more satisfying read for you, had there been no epilogue?  Explain, with diagrams, if necessary.

Mind you, Steve and I discussed this very thing at some length, and you see where we finally came down.  I do think this is a topic worthy of in-depth examination, and I'm interested to hear opinions.

Have at it.

Writer Brain

Saturday, March 5th, 2011 10:42 am
rolanni: (what it's like)

A reader asked what my interest in Sin in the Second City — the history of the Everleigh brothel in Chicago — was. The short answer is that I’m interested in the demimonde. We do work with certain types of. . .unsavory. . .individuals in our books and stories. Audrey Breckstone, for instance, runs a whorehouse in Boss Conrad’s territory on Surebleak, so reading about Chicago May and the Everleigh sisters could be annointed as “research.” But, yanno, everything’s research when you write fiction — see “grist for the mill.”

What also interested me about the Everleigh’s story was the fabric of Chicago at the turn of the century (frequent auditors of this journal will recall that I’m also guilty of reading The Devil in the White City), of which the club, and the Levee and the First Ward were all vibrant strands, the larger fabric of the nation at the time, and the. . .ease with which sexual hysteria gave birth to what became the FBI.

I must say that Sin in the Second City is miles above The Story of Chicago May in terms of author competence and, therefore, this reader’s enjoyment. Nuala O’Faolain seemed, at best, baffled by her subject, frustrated with actions that made no sense to a memoirist trying to get into another woman’s head. Ultimately, her attempt left me unsatisfied, and a little annoyed at her whispered conclusion that such women as May, really, don’t deserve the scrutiny of history.

Karen Abbott, on the other hand, is a reporter. She writes a clean hand, and brings a firm, largely non-judgmental voice to her narrative. Her book was a pleasure to read, and I came away from it with a nice headful of thoughts and ideas. Ms. Abbott learned that very valuable lesson — News (and History) is People.

Granted, part of the difference in the richness of the narration is the available records. May left a book, written after she was “reformed” and apparently none too factual. There were some police and prison records, a few newspaper reports. She was a part of the scenery of her time, only briefly elevated to newswothiness by her membership in a particularly inept criminal enterprise.

The Everleigh sisters, on the other hand, strove to be seen, to make a mark, to be favorably reviewed. Their club was patronized by Chicago’s wealthiest and best-placed men. They were firm pillars of the First Ward, if only for the staggering amount of protection money they paid.

They were also interesting to me because of their enlightened business model. They ran a whorehouse in Chicago in the early 1900s. At a time when their nearest competitor was charging $10 (in 1900-bucks, now) a trick, the Everleigh “butterflies” charged a whopping $50 per client. The girls were seen by a real doctor retained by the house, who, among other benefits, advised them to adopt what the Chicago Vice Commission some years later characterized as “perversion” in order to avoid disease and “other problems.” An Everleigh harlot could expect to earn (“take-home pay,” if you will) between $50 and $400 a week (in 1900-bucks). The “butterflies” were the healthiest, best-paid sex workers in the city of Chicago. It was a business model that succeeded brilliantly, and by its success ought to have inspired others to take up their methods.

Politics and people being what they are, of course that didn’t happen.

. . .This is all aside the “morality” of the business, of course, “morality” being a slippery stair at best. And certainly even high-class whores were subject to the various environmental dangers of living in the Levee, the quintessential Bad Neighborhood.

. . .which reminds me — notice the Writer Brain at work — of an article I read not too long ago about the uranium mines in. . .Colorado? There was “proved” a connection between working the mines to a high incidence of cancers among the mine workers, and so the mines were shut. No other business came to replace it, which is, if Maine is any measure, About Par, leaving the people out of pocket and wanting to work.

Every single person the reporter investigating this place spoke to bemoaned the loss of the “good jobs.” Yes, lots of people in town died of cancer, but the jobs in the mines were “good jobs” they were glad to have them, and they would return to the mine in a heartbeat if it were opened again. Life, the interviewees said, though not in so many words, is dangerous; people die here. It’s how we live and provide for our families that’s important.

. . .and — last diversion, I promise — a few years ago, I was reading histories of Indian abductions. At that time, a reader asked me why on earth I was reading that stuff. And I answered that I supposed the back-brain wanted it for something, and I had learned not to inquire too closely into these matters.

Years later, I now know why the back-brain wanted abduction stories, so — research. It’s all around you.




Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.
rolanni: (lit'rary moon)

So, the other day I had occasion to count on behalf of a Sekrit Project. And my counting revealed to me — and I revealed to Steve — that we have thus far in our careers committed (rounding only slightly up) 323,000 words of Liaden Universe® short stories.  (This number includes the not-quite-yet-published “Skyblaze” and the author-written fanfic “King of the Cats,” but does not include “Intelligent Design,” which is still in process.)

We’ve also written almost a million and a half words of Liaden Universe® novels.  Add in the rest and we’re at a cool 2mil.

All of which sounds, yanno, like A Lot, until you start putting perspective into the picture.  That’s only 34 stories, and 14-or-21 novels.  Which suddenly doesn’t sound so impressive, after all, but does bring me to my point.

Why yes, there was a point to this, besides the public display of an unhealthy fascination with numbers.

I was once stopped, nicely, correctly* by a young writer at a convention.  They were working on their first novel and had a couple of specific questions.  Clearly, they had put some thought into what they were doing and were not just haring off in all directions at once (which I admire; being a hare of long standing), and we had a very pleasant talk.  They spoke of their hopes for their story and the characters living inside it, but, suddenly confessed, with a sort of half-glance under the lashes, that they were afraid that the manuscript was getting a bit. . .long, and there was still a lot of story left.

How long was it?  I asked. Words, not pages.

Gratifyingly, they knew this (really, this was a very serious and thoughtful writer; I want to read them somebody, and I think I will).  “Thirty-five thousand words.”

“Oh,” I said, “you’ve got plenty of room!”

“I do?”

“Sure — at least seventy thousand more words.  Try not to go more than one hundred fifty thousand, total, though.”

“I had no idea novels were so. . .long,” they said, which seems funny from someone who (as this writer was) had read reasonably widely in the field, but which also seems true of nearly everyone.  No one has any idea how long novels are, except novelists.  And editors, of course.

So, that’s the point — novels are long.  Not only that, but it takes a significant chunk of time to write a 100,000 words, not to mention revising, polishing, so forth &c.

Because novels are long and take so much time and effort to produce, it’s important to chose a project that you’re excited about; that you can live with, day in, day out, morning-noon-night, for four months to a year.  It’s important that your characters are interesting to you, and are people with whom you have empathy.  I can’t imagine anything much worse than having someone I loathe living in my head for a year.

If you want to write a book, try to have fun.  I know, I know; it’s Serious and Important Work, and we’re taught that Serious and Important Work ought to be dealt with, well. . .seriously.  Soberly.  It’s this mindset that for many years contributed to my referring to my writing as play, as in: “I’m going to go play now.”

. . .and so I shall.

————-

*They came up to me as I was leaning against the wall — waiting for Steve, as it happened — introduced themselves, explained that they were writing a novel, realized that, as Guest of Honor I was of course very busy, but wondered if I would have perhaps ten minutes over the weekend to talk to them; they were writing a novel and had some questions.  Polite and respectful.  Well done.




Originally published at Sharon Lee, Writer. You can comment here or there.
rolanni: (agatha&clank)
Today, for instance, I needed to know Kareen yos'Phelium's address. You'd think I'd have these things memorized, wouldn't you?

You'd be wrong.

Well, at least I knew where to look, and that bit of information is now part of the Mouse and Dragon working wiki, which may actually be good for something else by the time I finish this book.

I'm in a bit of a creative fugue state; something that I'd frankly thought I'd grown out of. The ideas are coming faster than I can write them in-story, so I'm making notes like a mad, note-taking mad thing and hoping to ghod this keeps up. More plot twists! Ooh! So this is why people do this writing thing! Well, this and the adulation of thousands hundreds.

Because of the mad-note-taking business, I didn't get quite as many story-words as I had hoped, but we're still moving along at a steady clip. The weatherbeans are calling a winter storm warning for Sunday into Monday -- heavy snow, again. Can I luck into two three-day weekends in a row? Stay tuned.

Progress on Mouse and Dragon

Zokutou word meterZokutou word meter
24,523 / 100,000
(24.5%)


"Please forgive me, Clonak."

There came a sigh, very soft.

"How can I refuse you anything, Goddess? If it is forgiveness you require of me, then of course it is yours."
rolanni: (foxy)
A Bildungsroman is a "coming of age" novel. Literature -- even genre literature -- is littered with the things; after all, Growing Up is one of the great themes of fiction, like: Man* Against Man, Man Against The Other, Man Against Academe, Man Against Himself, &c, &c. Examples of such works include, but are by no means limited to: The Catcher in the Rye, Oliver Twist, The Witches of Karres, Stranger in a Strange Land, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Balance of Trade and Fledgling/Saltation.

With the theme being so prevalent, it's a little startling to find people who state flatly that they Never Read and/or Actively Dislike Coming of Age Novels. It's like those peculiar people who state that they abhor books told in the first person because first person is the sign that the writer has not mastered their craft -- i.e. it's easy to write in first person. Trust me, it's not.

Neither is it easy to write about young people and their growing up, especially if one wishes to maintain the basic dignity of the character and the integrity of the experiences that shape them into the adult they will become.

I read coming of age novels, just like I read novels that deal with Man Against The Other, or Man Against Himself (though I confess to a slight distaste for Man Can't Have Erection; happily there are few of those in the genres in which I typically read) -- I mean, they're stories, and stories need certain things to drive them: Theme, for one.

Maybe I'm in a minority, though. What do you guys think of Coming of Age novels? Love 'em? Loathe 'em? Kid's Stuff? Inquiring minds want to know!

-------
*Where "Man" stands in for "Human" -- I'm sorry; I got all this stuff back in the Bad Old Days when we could say things this way and not offend three-quarters of the internet. Which didn't exist. Which was probably a blessing.
rolanni: (flittermouse)
Today, we followed the Plan, the Plan being: Arise early, and yet not too early, don clothing appropriate to the day and hour and hit the Butchers Block in Fairfield for breakfast. Having eaten well, and yea verily caffeinated, too, we removed to SRM Galactic Headquarters, there to sign a quarter-zillion books. This small task accomplished, we to Shaw's and then Hannaford to do some modest hunting and gathering before returning home to the Cat Farm, there to dispose fitly of the Subway sandwich that we had likewise hunted and gathered, and so to our scattered computers went.

Steve is still working. I finished Chapter Eight, found a quote for the top of Chapter Nine and got set up for tomorrow's labor among the vines: Big tea party, very posh, lots of poisonous chit-chat -- you know I want to be fresh for that.

For those who have opinions on favorite -- and not-so-favorite -- series, Laura Anne Gilman, our own [livejournal.com profile] suricattus, talks about continuity matters here (and with a nice nod to the Liaden Universe®).

The weatherbeans are still calling a Big Storm Sunday afternoon into Monday morning, with a total accumulation of 8-12 inches. I hope it's true this time, 'cause I could sure use not going in to work on Monday.

For now, I guess I'd better make myself some kind of useful and do the dishes.

Zokutou word meterZokutou word meter
18,699 / 100,000
(18.7%)

Narrative Technique

Saturday, August 30th, 2008 01:12 pm
rolanni: (drosselmeyer)
Yesterday was as bad a day of perfesser-herding as I've had at the day-job, surpassing my previous benchmark, last fall. That one took place against the back drop of a Full Departmental Move-In, and Supervising the Unpacking,too, to give you some measure of Sheer Hellishness that was yesterday.

Arriving home by way of the CVS, where the pharmacy was out of my drugs (sigh), and the post office, where my Abney Park CDs were waiting for me (yes!), I found that I Had No Brain left to deal wtih any of the SRM Office Stuff, and certainly not for writing. I therefore stretched out on the couch and listened to From Dreams or Angels, until Steve announced that SRM was closed for the day, and the two of us viewed the latest in from Netflix.

I had a good time with "Eddie Izzard: Dress to Kill" (yes, I'm coming to it late; this is why I have a Netflix account; to view all the cool films I've missed), but it got me to thinking, about being a "lesbian drag queen" less than about the architecture of narrative.

In "Dress to Kill," the ...story our narrator tells is interesting because, though it seems to wander, it is in fact built in a tight spiral. Several touch-points are planted early -- Ciao!, the president of Burundi, how planting flags widen empires, cousins marrying is bad, Nazis -- and the narration touches upon them with precision as it seemingly freewheels through a survey of European history, a synopsis of "The Great Escape", the difficulty of making monkeys do as they're told in desperate situations, the invention of the Heimlich Manuever, the building of Stonehenge, the naming of Engelbert Humperdink, and an encapsulation of "Speed" in French.

What I wonder is, if you went back and saw the show again the next night, would the monologue contained within the spiral have changed? That is, is the Whole Thing memorized and told out in exact order, show after show, or if only those key points of structure are immutable. I'm thinking that the narration does change from show to show -- at one point Eddie Izzard delivers a joke, the audience laughs, and he says, "That's such a crap joke. Some nights, I don't even say it."

I'm also interested in the idea of how much variation in the overall narrative you could have, given the same -- eight? dozen? -- touchstones that form the spiral.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags